Current:Home > ScamsA Dutch court orders Greenpeace activists to leave deep-sea mining ship in the South Pacific -AssetLink
A Dutch court orders Greenpeace activists to leave deep-sea mining ship in the South Pacific
View
Date:2025-04-15 06:47:46
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — A Dutch court ruled Thursday that Greenpeace protesters staging a sit-in must leave a deep-sea mining exploration ship in the Pacific Ocean between Mexico and Hawaii but that they can continue to demonstrate around the vessel.
Canada-based The Metals Company, whose subsidiary Nauru Ocean Resources Inc. runs the ship, Coco, accused the protesters of endangering the crew and breaking international law.
The case was heard in Amsterdam, where the Greenpeace protest ship Arctic Sunrise, which is involved in the protest, is registered.
Greenpeace began the protest a week ago by paddling kayaks beneath the Coco for up to 10 hours at a time to prevent it deploying equipment in the water. Two activists also boarded the ship and pledged to stay camped on the main crane used to deploy and retrieve equipment from the water until The Metals Company agrees to leave.
The protest comes as international demand for critical minerals found on the seafloor grows, but an increasing number of countries say more research is needed into the environmental impacts of deep-sea mining.
A subsidiary of The Metals Company has been conducting exploratory research in the Clarion Clipperton Zone of the Pacific since 2011. They say data from their latest expedition, researching how the seabed recovered from exploration last year, will be used in an application to begin mining in 2025.
In a summary ruling, Amsterdam District Court said that Greenpeace can “continue its actions around a ship in the South Pacific, but must instruct its activists to immediately leave” the vessel.
The court said that while Greenpeace has a profound interest in protesting against the research “its interest in doing so on the ship itself weighs less heavily than the interest of the owner of the ship, who is responsible for the safety of those on board.”
The court said Greenpeace would have to pay 50,000 euros ($54,560) per day up to a maximum of 500,000 euros if the activists remain on the ship.
A Greenpeace statement called the ruling “a massive setback for the deep-sea mining industry.” It also lashed out at The Metals Company, claiming it “has never been interested in scrutiny and they can’t stand that Greenpeace is watching and opposing them at every turn.”
“We are determined to keep bringing this dangerous industry to public attention and will continue to disrupt this dangerous industry”, said Mads Christensen, head of Greenpeace International.
The Metals Company CEO & Chairman Gerard Barron welcomed the ruling.
“We respect Greenpeace’s right to peaceful protest and expression of opinions,” Barron said. “However, our foremost responsibility is to ensure the safe continuance of our legally-mandated operations, and the safety of all those involved.”
He said the company would “continue to gather the important scientific data” for members of the International Seabed Authority.
Environmental groups reject deep-sea mining and fear the international authority will soon authorize the world’s first license to harvest minerals from the ocean floor.
Mining companies say that harvesting minerals from the deep sea instead of land is cheaper and has less of an environmental impact. But scientists and environmental groups argue that less than 1% of the world’s deep seas have been explored, and they warn that deep-sea mining could unleash noise, light and suffocating dust storms.
veryGood! (16)
Related
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Who can vote in US elections, and what steps must you take to do so?
- Dream Builder Wealth Society: A Blueprint for Future Wealth
- Time's Running Out for Jaw-Dropping Prime Day Hair Deals: Dyson Airwrap, Color Wow, Wet Brush & More
- Golf's No. 1 Nelly Korda looking to regain her form – and her spot on the Olympic podium
- Texas now top seed, Notre Dame rejoins College Football Playoff bracket projection
- Charge against TikTok personality upgraded in the killing of a Louisiana therapist
- Georgia university leaders ask NCAA to ban transgender women from sports
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Courts could see a wave of election lawsuits, but experts say the bar to change the outcome is high
Ranking
- Daughter of Utah death row inmate navigates complicated dance of grief and healing before execution
- Lawsuit says Virginia is illegally purging legitimate voters off the rolls
- October Prime Day 2024 Sell-Out Risks: 24 Best Deals from Crest, Laneige & More You Really Need to Grab
- Some East Palestine derailment settlement payments should go out even during appeal of the deal
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Hurry! These October Prime Day 2024 Deals Under $25 on Beauty, Home, Travel, Kids & More Won’t Last Long
- Lawsuit says Virginia is illegally purging legitimate voters off the rolls
- Allyson Felix launches women-focused sports management firm
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
When is an interview too tough? CBS News grappling with question after Dokoupil interview
'Dancing With the Stars' Anna Delvey elimination episode received historic fan votes
30% Off Color Wow Hair Products for Amazon Prime Day 2024: Best Deals Guide
Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
Jets' head coach candidates after Robert Saleh firing: Bill Belichick or first-time hire?
Law letting Tennessee attorney general argue certain capital cases is constitutional, court rules
Dyson Airwrap vs. Revlon One-Step Volumizer vs. Shark FlexStyle: Which Prime Day Deal Is Worth It?
Like
- RFK Jr. grilled again about moving to California while listing New York address on ballot petition
- Keith Urban Reacts to His and Nicole Kidman’s Daughter Sunday Making Runway Debut at Paris Fashion Week
- Courts could see a wave of election lawsuits, but experts say the bar to change the outcome is high